By Pierre van der Merwe (Partner),
and Ofentse Setoaba (Candidate Attorney)
06 March 2025
By Pierre van der Merwe (Partner),
and Ofentse Setoaba (Candidate Attorney)
06 March 2025
INTRODUCTION
Sequestration is a legal process that aims to rehabilitate an insolvent person (“debtor”) by taking temporary possession of the debtor’s estate and realising property in the estate to satisfy the debtor’s debts and obligations. The sequestration of a debtor’s estate is governed by the Insolvency Act No 24 of 1936 (“Insolvency Act”). This article aims to shed light on the effects of the Insolvency Act on the estate of the solvent spouse (whose estate has not been sequestrated) of the debtor, the so-called “solvent spouse”.
INSOLVENCY ACT
Section 21 of the Insolvency Act regulates the effect of sequestration on the property of the solvent spouse. Section 21(1) and (2) of the Insolvency Act provide as follows:
What is evident from section 21(1) of the Insolvency Act is that the property of solvent spouse will automatically vest with the Master or trustee as if it formed part of the insolvent debtor’s property. Section 21(2) of the Insolvency Act provides for when the Trustee should release the property of the solvent spouse. Section 21(4) of the Insolvency Act grants the solvent spouse a remedy to apply to court for the release of any property that has vested in the trustee pursuant to section 21(1).
RELEVANT CASE LAW
The Court held in Harksen v Lane NO and Others 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC) in paragraphs 36 to 37 that the purpose and effect of the section 21 of the Insolvency Act was not to permanently transfer or divest the property of the solvent spouse but to give the Master or the trustee an opportunity to establish and ensure that the insolvent estate is not deprived of any property that it is entitled to.
In De Villiers NO v Delta Cables (Pty) Ltd 1992 (1) SA 9 (A) it was found that the provisions of section 21(1) read with 21(2) and (4) of the Insolvency Act aim to prevent any collusion of property between spouses to the disadvantage of creditors of the insolvent estate.
Lastly in Motala and Another NNO v Moller and Others 2014 (6) SA 223 (GJ), specifically at paragraph 24, it was held that the provisions of section 21(1) of the Insolvency Act vests the solvent spouse’s property in the trustee as if it was the property of the insolvent debtor. The trustee will possess the same rights, powers and obligations in the solvent spouse’s property as those applicable to the debtor’s estate.
THE SOLVENT SPOUSE’S REMEDIES
The solvent spouse may apply to the court in terms of section 21(4) and (10) of the Insolvency Act for the release of any property that has vested in the trustee. Section 21(10) of the Insolvency Act requires that the court must be satisfied that the solvent spouse will safeguard the interests of the insolvent estate should they be excluded from vesting in the trustee.
CONCLUSION
It is evident from the Insolvency Act and relevant case law that a solvent spouse’s property will vest with the Master or trustee as if it formed part of the debtor’s estate to avoid potential collusion resulting in the insolvent estate being deprived of property that it is entitled to. The trustee will be only obliged to release such property under certain statutory provisions and exceptions. The solvent spouse may apply to the court for the release of the solvent spouse’s property, but the court must be satisfied that the interests of the insolvent estate will be safeguarded should it be released to the solvent spouse.