By Pierre van der Merwe (Partner),
Aqeel Arabie (Associate), and
Kiana Naidoo (Candidate Attorney)
23 March 2026
By Pierre van der Merwe (Partner),
Aqeel Arabie (Associate), and
Kiana Naidoo (Candidate Attorney)
23 March 2026
INTRODUCTION
It is a common misconception that the execution of an agreement for the sale of immovable property renders the transaction irrevocable. However, Section 29A of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 (the “ALA”) provides a notable exception in the form of a “cooling-off period”, which affords certain purchasers the right to rescind or revoke the agreement within a prescribed period following signature of the agreement.
THE COOLING-OFF RIGHT
s29A(1) ALA provides that a purchaser or prospective purchaser may revoke an offer to purchase land or terminate a deed of alienation within five days after signing the agreement, by delivering written notice to the seller or the seller’s agent.
In terms of s29A(2) ALA, this period excludes:
WHO THE RIGHT APPLIES TO
The cooling-off right is not absolute; it does not apply to every property transaction. s29A(5) of the ALA provides that the right does not apply in circumstances where:
In practice, this means the protection generally applies to individual purchasers acquiring lower-value residential property, with a value of less than R250 000.
REFUND OF MONEY PAID
In terms of s29A(4) ALA, If the purchaser of property cancels the agreement within the cooling-off period, any person who received money in respect of the agreement must refund the full amount within ten(10) days after the Notice was delivered.
CASE LAW IN TERMS OF S2(2A) ALA:
In the Sayers case, the Court confirmed that the cooling-off period did not apply because the purchaser’s right to cancel the agreement was not included in the Deed of Alienation, as required by s2(2A) ALA.¹ However, in Dolphin Coast, the seller relied on the absence of the cooling-off clause in the Deed of Alienation to escape the contract. The Court held that s2(2A) does not automatically invalidate the agreement, especially where the purchaser seeks to enforce the sale.²
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, s29A serves as an important statutory safeguard, affording eligible purchasers a defined period within which to reconsider their commitment to a property purchase, prior to the property sale agreement becoming legally binding.
Please note: this article is for general public information and use. It is not to be considered or construed as legal advice. Each matter must be dealt with on a case-by-case basis and you should consult an attorney before taking any action contemplated herein.
¹Sayers v Khan 2002 (5) SA 688 (C)
²Section Three Dolphin Coast Medical Centre CC and Another v Cowar Investments (Pty) Ltd 2006 (2) SA 15 D